|
|
Fact applied to the Administration of Justice, the draft regulates identification by electronic means ; the generalization of electronic media in the relationship with the Administration of Justice through the General Access Point of the Administration of Justice and the use of electronic judicial headquarters; the incorporation of a personalized access system called “Justice Folder” or the establishment of preference for the practice of judicial communications via telematic means. Likewise, the draft includes, among others, modifications to the procedural rules in all jurisdictional orders.
All of this, as stated in the Explanation of Reasons of the norm, placing as an “absolute priority” the protection of the constitutional right to effective judicial protection. The draft report points out, first of Phone Number Data all, that the idea of efficiency of the “public service of Justice” is confusing and without tradition in our legal system and recommends referring this concept to the Administration of Justice , which is the recipient of the measures. aimed at the implementation of technological means and the use of technology, without prejudice to the fact that said measures have a projection on jurisdictional activity - particularly in its procedural sphere - and, therefore, on the exercise of the jurisdictional function.
Only in this way, he affirms, can the link between efficiency and effective judicial protection be understood , a right to which the draft insistently ties the purpose of the norm. The proposed opinion recalls that effectiveness is predicable of the Public Administrations (as established by the Constitution in its article 103.1) and, therefore, also of the Administration of Justice; but it is not predicable of the Judicial Power as a Power of the State nor of the jurisdictional power, to which the Constitution unites the principles of independence, exclusivity, impartiality and submission to the rule of law.
|
|
發表於 13:54:56